{"id":138,"date":"2010-03-26T02:03:26","date_gmt":"2010-03-26T02:03:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fatsquirrel.org\/bologs\/vng\/reproduction\/"},"modified":"2010-03-26T02:03:26","modified_gmt":"2010-03-26T02:03:26","slug":"reproduction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fatsquirrel.org\/oldfartsalmanac\/reproduction\/","title":{"rendered":"Reproduction"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>My sister has given birth to beautiful <a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/veghead\/sets\/72157623695146570\/\">Lily Alice<\/a>! Obviously I&#8217;m using the word &#8220;beautiful&#8221; in baby terms, she&#8217;s all scrunchy and newborn, but probably one of the prettiest babies I&#8217;ve ever seen. And I&#8217;m relying on photographs to help me form these opinions because they&#8217;re 3000 miles away. Which is quite a sad thing. I miss my family. A lot.<\/p>\n<p>On the subject of reproduction, I recently discovered some more malfeasance in the dubious realm of the music\/movie copy-protection racket. We came across a DVD that refused to copy to our hard-drive. Copying a DVD to your hard-drive is not necessarily illegal BTW; deciding to watch something later is not a crime. Normally I use <a href=\"http:\/\/vobcopy.org\/\">vobcopy<\/a> because it is simple and reliable, but this time it got to 16M of one particular VOB and then hung.<\/p>\n<p>A glass of Google later I had discovered some recent &#8220;advances&#8221; in copy protection called things like &#8220;RipGuard&#8221; and &#8220;ARccOS&#8221;. They sound pretty bloody impressive in the press-releases (Google it, I&#8217;m not linking to the twats) but of course in reality they are the same old shit that the industry has been trying to con the public with for years: breaking the DVD in a way that &#8220;most&#8221; DVD players won&#8217;t notice. Just like <a href=\"http:\/\/fatsquirrel.org\/bologs\/veghead\/vm\/249\/\">they tried to do with CDs<\/a>. If you get one of these DVDs, make sure you inform the vendor that it is damaged and demand a refund. <\/p>\n<p>A reminder to the faithless: this will <i>only<\/i> penalize the legitimate users. If you buy a DVD that won&#8217;t play then tough tits. Whereas if you buy an <i>illegal<\/i> DVD, the dudes who get paid to crack the crap protection will have rendered it perfectly usable. They have people who can crack this lame bullshit &#8211; because they can spend money to buy people who understand how it works. The purchaser doesn&#8217;t have these resources. So the legit buyer is being punished again.<\/p>\n<p>It took a very short amount of time for me to work out how to defeat this &#8220;Advanced Copy Protection&#8221; and I was only doing it out of bloody-mindedness by this stage. I don&#8217;t even want to watch the fucking film. BTW, the magic word is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.gnu.org\/software\/ddrescue\/ddrescue.html\">ddrescue<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Macrovision, who are, in my personal opinion, an anachronistic bunch of impotent losers, claim that with this &#8220;Advanced Copy Protection&#8221; <\/p>\n<blockquote><p>95% of casual users lack the knowledge and\/or determination to be able to copy a DVD<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Now, this is bollocks in so many ways it&#8217;s difficult to know where to start, so I&#8217;ll go for two main issues: firstly, &#8220;95%&#8221; is one of the 88.5% of statistics that are made up on the spot &#8211; can we have some evidence to support this dubious claim? Secondly, casual users do <i>not<\/i> copy DVDs; they get them after the &lt;1% of expert users have ripped them using the multitude of simple tools that are available to them. No-one needs to worry about casual users, they are totally dumb. You don&#8217;t need to be an expert to buy a DVD from a woman in the pub or download a rip. By the time it&#8217;s available to buy, a single &#8220;expert&#8221; somewhere has already copied it.<\/p>\n<p>Again, the hackers and crackers are not hurt by copy-protection. Only the buyer. You are buying damaged goods. Watch the movie, then take it back and complain.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>My sister has given birth to beautiful Lily Alice! Obviously I&#8217;m using the word &#8220;beautiful&#8221; in baby terms, she&#8217;s all scrunchy and newborn, but probably one of the prettiest babies I&#8217;ve ever seen. And I&#8217;m relying on photographs to help me form these opinions because they&#8217;re 3000 miles away. Which is quite a sad thing. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-138","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fatsquirrel.org\/oldfartsalmanac\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fatsquirrel.org\/oldfartsalmanac\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fatsquirrel.org\/oldfartsalmanac\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fatsquirrel.org\/oldfartsalmanac\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fatsquirrel.org\/oldfartsalmanac\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=138"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/fatsquirrel.org\/oldfartsalmanac\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fatsquirrel.org\/oldfartsalmanac\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=138"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fatsquirrel.org\/oldfartsalmanac\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=138"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fatsquirrel.org\/oldfartsalmanac\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=138"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}